Showing posts with label Avastin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Avastin. Show all posts

24 April 2012

Novartis Tries to Force Hospitals to Use Its Drug

Story first appeared in The Associated Press.

Drug maker Novartis is taking legal action in Britain to make state-run hospitals use an eye drug that costs about 700 pounds ($1,130) per shot instead of a cheaper one that costs 60 pounds ($97).

In a statement, Novartis said it was calling for a judicial review as a last resort because it believed patient safety was being potentially compromised.

According to the U.K.'s health watchdog, Novartis' Lucentis is the only drug recommended to treat the eye problem macular degeneration in the country's state-run National Health Service hospitals.

However, several NHS hospitals have been prescribing the much cheaper Avastin, a cancer drug made by Genentech Inc., for the same problem even though it has not been officially approved.

Most doctors only prescribe drugs approved by the health watchdog, but have the discretion to use other treatments if they believe they are warranted.

Last year, four hospitals in southern England decided they would pay for Avastin when it was prescribed by a doctor.

In a statement Tuesday, Novartis AG said it was demanding a judicial review to make the hospitals use Lucentis rather than Avastin.

Novartis said it was concerned patients and clinicians were being pushed to use an unlicensed medicine in order to cut costs. Britain's coalition government has mandated that its National Health Service trim $20 billion ($31 billion) from its budget by 2015 as part of a national austerity drive.

It is unacceptable to put the safety of patients at risk through the widespread use of an unlicensed treatment when a licensed medicine is available. Novartis noted there was emerging evidence of safety concerns for using Avastin to treat eye problems.

Patient groups called for an independent analysis to determine which drug should be used. If Avastin is not as safe as Lucentis, no one should be using it. If it is as good, perhaps everyone should be using it.

Government ministers should hold an appraisal of whether Avastin was safe to use in eye diseases. Eye doctors are divided over whether Avastin is as safe and effective as Lucentis.

Other critics slammed Novartis for their decision to go to the courts.

Companies like Novartis should not be in the position to block moves to more cost-effective treatments in order to maximize their profits. It was legitimate for health providers to use treatments that were much cheaper than ones that were already licensed.


For more healthcare and medical related news, visit the Healthcare and Medical blog.
For national and worldwide related business news, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For local and Michigan business related news, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For law related news, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For real estate and home related news, visit the  Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For technology and electronics related news, visit the Electronics America blog.
For organic SEO and web optimization related news, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

15 February 2012

Counterfeit Cancer Drug Circulating in US


First appeared in Wall Street Journal
The maker of the widely used Avastin cancer drug said Tuesday that it is warning doctors, hospitals and patient groups that a counterfeit version of the medicine has been found in the U.S.  A Miami Medical Malpractice Lawyer is curious.

Tests of counterfeit vials of Avastin showed that they didn't contain the active ingredient in Roche Holding AG's intravenous drug, according to the Swiss company's Genentech unit.

It isn't clear how much of the counterfeit product was distributed in the U.S. or whether it has caused any harm. A Genentech spokeswoman said the company doesn't know if any patients were given the fake drug.

The Food and Drug Administration is investigating, and has sent letters to 19 medical practices in the U.S. that the agency says buy unapproved cancer medicines and might have bought the counterfeit Avastin.

An FDA spokeswoman said it hasn't received any reports of patient side effects that appear to be linked to the counterfeit product. At Milwaukee cancer care, they have not noticed any irregularities yet.

Most Americans don't question the integrity of the drugs they rely on. They view drug counterfeiting, if they are aware of it at all, as a problem for developing countries. But the latest incident, which follows the appearance of other fake drugs in the U.S.—including counterfeits of the weight-loss treatment Alli and the influenza treatment Tamiflu—suggests it is a growing risk, especially as more medicines and drug ingredients sold in the U.S. are made overseas.

In addition to the specter of fake medicines, U.S. drug makers are confronting their own shortcomings. Companies including Johnson & Johnson have had to shut down manufacturing plants due to quality problems. Earlier this month, Pfizer Inc. said it recalled about a million packs of birth-control pills because improper packaging could raise the risk of unplanned pregnancies.

Roche still is testing the vials of counterfeit Avastin to see what ingredients they contain, but the Genentech spokeswoman said: "It's not Avastin. It's not safe and effective, and it shouldn't be used."

Genentech said it is asking health-care providers to report any suspected counterfeits to the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations.

Avastin belongs to a class of cancer therapies that interferes with the development of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. The pricey drug, often used with chemotherapy, is for certain patients with colon, lung and other cancers. The drug was at the center of a controversy last year, because the FDA withdrew approval for its use for breast cancer, angering many patients.

A 400-milligram vial of Avastin—the size that was counterfeited—costs $2,400, according to the Genentech spokeswoman.

Last year, Genentech's sales of Avastin in the U.S. generated more than $2.5 billion, the spokeswoman said. Many patients receive it intravenously, typically in a hospital or doctor's office, every two or three weeks for as long as a year.  A Miami Medical Malpractice Lawyer is contemplating what this means.

"Most [cancer] doctors in an average workweek will be using it. It is a commonly used drug," said Leonard Saltz, who runs the colorectal oncology section at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Dr. Saltz, who also chairs the pharmacy committee monitoring the safety of Sloan-Kettering's drug supply, said the Avastin news will prompt doctors and hospitals to double-check their sourcing of the product and make sure their supplies are safe.

Experts say counterfeits are a relatively small but still serious problem for the nation's drug supply. In the U.S., most prescription medicines are distributed by authorized suppliers, who buy them from their manufacturers and assure their integrity. Pharmacies, too, put pressure on the distributors to ensure quality.

Still counterfeits can enter the drug supply through unauthorized distributors and Internet pharmacies that try to turn a quick profit selling the inauthentic products. Doctors and patients might not know they are using a counterfeit if it doesn't cause harm but simply fails to work.

The counterfeit Avastin was packaged in boxes and vials whose markings were clearly different from the authentic product, according to the Genentech spokeswoman. In the U.S., boxes of authentic Avastin are labeled in English, say they were made by Genentech and have a six-digit lot number with no letters. The counterfeit boxes had writing in French, identified Roche as the manufacturer, and had lot numbers on the boxes or vials starting with B86017, B6011 or B6010.

Roche first learned there might be a counterfeit problem when an unnamed foreign health authority notified the company in December of inauthentic Avastin made overseas and said it was investigating, the Genentech spokeswoman said. Later, the FDA warned the company. The FDA said it was alerted by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the U.K.

On Friday, the FDA sent letters to 19 medical practices, mostly in California, that the agency said had bought medicines from the suppliers of the counterfeit Avastin. The two-page letters identified the suppliers as Quality Specialty Products, which the FDA said also might be known as Montana Health Care Solutions. The letter said that QSP's products are distributed by Volunteer Distribution in Gainesboro, Tenn.

"A high percentage of these products are injectable cancer medications whose quality could be adversely affected if they are not stored or transported under specific temperatures," the letter added.

QSP and Volunteer Distribution couldn't be reached for comment Tuesday night, nor could 17 of the 19 medical practices.

"I did not have the Avastin they were referring to," said Naresh Gupta, a Plano, Texas, oncologist who received the FDA's letter Monday. He said he purchased Avastin for his practice from a large national drug distributor that wasn't named in the FDA's announcement.

A second doctor, Raymond Heung, of San Diego, said he didn't know anything about the Avastin problems or the FDA letter.

In its letter, the FDA asked the medical practices to "cease using and retain and secure all remaining products" from the suppliers. It also issued a general warning to medical practices asking them to "stop using" any products they might have from the two companies and report any suspect items that the companies supplied.

The Genentech spokeswoman said none of the suppliers identified by the FDA are authorized to distribute Avastin. "Genentech limits the distribution of many of its products and only sells its products directly to a defined number of fully licensed and contracted wholesalers and specialty distributors," she said.

Counterfeiting has historically been more of a problem outside the U.S. Counterfeit Avastin was injected into the eyes of 116 patients at a Shanghai hospital, resulting in an outbreak of complications, hospital officials reported last year in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine. The active ingredient in Avastin is sometimes used to treat macular degeneration, a disease that causes vision loss, though it isn't approved for that use in the U.S.

Concerns about counterfeit drugs sold in the U.S. have grown as more products and their ingredients are made abroad. The FDA has been issuing warnings about counterfeits on average once or twice a year.

In 2010, fake versions of the over-the-counter weight-loss drug Alli were being sold over the Internet. The counterfeit versions didn't contain the active ingredient in Alli and instead contained sibutramine, the active ingredient in the prescription-strength weight-loss drug Meridia, which has since been removed from the U.S. market because of concerns the drug increased the risk of heart attacks.

Also in 2010, the FDA warned consumers that a product sold as "Generic Tamiflu," an influenza treatment, was actually a counterfeit containing a penicillin-like antibiotic, rather than flu-fighting antiviral drugs. And a Belgian man pleaded guilty in a U.S. court last year to selling $1.4 million worth of fake or misbranded drugs, including potentially phony Viagra and Lipitor, both Pfizer drugs, over the Internet.

U.S. customs agents and regulators are spot-checking drug imports with increasingly sophisticated laboratory equipment, but the growing volume of shipments has made it "increasingly difficult for us to regulate our own supply chain," said Tom Woods, of Woods International LLC, a consulting firm that advises on avoiding drug counterfeiting.

08 June 2010

Study: Avastin Keeps Ovarian Cancer in Check

LA Times

 
In a study of 1,873 women with untreated ovarian cancer, Avastin extended progression-free survival by 39% compared with standard chemotherapy alone.

The cancer drug Avastin extends progression-free survival by 39% in ovarian cancer patients, a significant improvement in a cancer that has proved extremely difficult to treat.

Some oncologists are already using Avastin — which is widely and successfully used for lung, colon and breast tumors — to treat ovarian cancer that has recurred, but such use has never been formally studied. The new study, reported Sunday at a Chicago meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, is also the first to use the drug as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer among American women, striking an estimated 22,000 women each year, and the fifth most deadly, killing 15,000. Conventional chemotherapy uses the powerful drugs carboplatin and paclitaxel, which can have severe side effects.

Avastin, in contrast, is targeted at a naturally occurring protein called vascular endothelial growth factor, which is overproduced in many cancers and stimulates the growth of new blood vessels that nourish the tumor. That targeting means it has fewer potential side effects and thus represents an improvement in therapy for ovarian cancer, said Dr. Robert A. Burger of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, who led the new study.

Burger and his colleagues studied 1,873 women with previously untreated ovarian cancer that had metastasized to the stomach and other organs. A third of them received conventional chemotherapy plus Avastin at the time of chemotherapy and in maintenance doses throughout the follow-up; a third received conventional chemotherapy plus Avastin and maintenance doses of a placebo; and a third received only conventional chemotherapy plus placebos.

Burger reported that during the 17 months of follow-up, conventional chemotherapy held the women's tumors in check for 10.3 months before they started progressing again, while chemotherapy plus Avastin and maintenance doses increased that period to 14.1 months.

Using Avastin during the initial chemotherapy period without maintenance doses provided no statistically significant increase in progression-free survival. The study is ongoing, so the researchers do not yet know how the drug affected overall survival.

The principal side effects of the treatment were increases in blood pressure and gastrointestinal problems. The women also had somewhat more pain than those taking placebo. All are similar to side effects observed in treating other types of cancer.

The drug was developed by South San Francisco-based Genentech, a subsidiary of Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche. Genentech said it would apply to the Food and Drug Administration for permission to market the drug for use against ovarian cancer. Such approval is normally required before insurance companies will pay for treatment.

The study was funded by Roche, but was organized and overseen by the National Cancer Institute.